<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Transactions on Combinatorics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8657</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Total perfect codes in graphs realized by commutative rings</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>295</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>307</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">26081</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/toc.2021.122946.1727</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rameez</FirstName>
					<LastName>Raja</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Hazratbal-190006, Srinagar, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity not equal to zero and let $\Gamma(R)$ be a zero-divisor graph realized by $R$. For a simple, undirected, connected graph $G = (V, E)$, a {\it total perfect code} denoted by $C(G)$ in $G$ is a subset $C(G) \subseteq V(G)$ such that $|N(v) \cap C(G)| = 1$ for all $v \in V(G)$, where $N(v)$ denotes the open neighbourhood of a vertex $v$ in $G$. In this paper, we study total perfect codes in graphs which are realized as zero-divisor graphs. We show a zero-divisor graph realized by a local commutative ring with unity admits a total perfect code if and only if the graph has degree one vertices. We also show that if $\Gamma(R)$ is a regular graph on $|Z^*(R)|$ number of vertices, then $R$ is a reduced ring and $|Z^*(R)| \equiv 0 (mod ~2)$, where $Z^*(R)$ is a set of non-zero zero-divisors of $R$. We provide a characterization for all commutative rings with unity of which the realized zero-divisor graphs admit total perfect codes. Finally, we determine the cardinality of a total perfect code in $\Gamma(R)$ and discuss the significance of the study of total perfect codes in graphs realized by commutative rings with unity.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ring</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">zero-divisor</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Zero-divisor graph</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">perfect code</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">total perfect code</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://toc.ui.ac.ir/article_26081_b310028bfbd7cbc36e3ad3df8708b1fd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Transactions on Combinatorics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8657</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The identifying code number and Mycielski's construction of graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>309</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>316</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">26088</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/toc.2021.126368.1794</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Athena</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shaminejad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Imam Khomeini International University of Qazvin, P.O.Box 3414896818, Qazvin, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ebrahim</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vatandoost</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Imam Khomeini International University of Qazvin, P.O.Box 3414896818, Qazvin, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kamran</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirasheh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Imam Khomeini International University of Qazvin, P.O.Box 3414896818, Qazvin, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $G=(V, E)$ be a simple graph. A set $C$ of vertices $G$ is an identifying code of $G$ if for every two vertices $x$ and $y$ the sets $N_{G} [x] \cap C$ and $N_{G} [y] \cap C$ are non-empty and different. Given a graph $G,$ the smallest size of an identifying code of $G$ is called the identifying code number of $G$ and denoted by $\gamma^{ID}(G).$ Two vertices $x$ and $y$ are twins when $N_{G}[x]=N_{G}[y].$ Graphs with at least two twin vertices are not an identifiable graph. In this paper, we deal with the identifying code number of Mycielski&#039;s construction of graph $G.$ We prove that the Mycielski&#039;s construction of every graph $G$ of order $n \geq 2,$ is an identifiable graph. Also, we present two upper bounds for the identifying code number of Mycielski&#039;s construction $G,$ such that these two bounds are sharp. Finally, we show that Foucaud et al.&#039;s conjecture is holding for Mycielski&#039;s construction of some graphs.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">dominating set</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Identifying code</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mycielski's Construction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Identifiable Graph</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://toc.ui.ac.ir/article_26088_858b032cc710d026f084d95cbe679621.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Transactions on Combinatorics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8657</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Bounds for the pebbling number of product graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>317</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>326</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">25997</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/toc.2021.128705.1855</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nopparat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pleanmani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nuttawoot</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nupo</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Somnuek</FirstName>
					<LastName>Worawiset</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Let $G$ be a connected graph. Given a configuration of a fixed number of pebbles on the vertex set of $G$, a pebbling move on $G$ is the process of removing two pebbles from a vertex and adding one pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number of $G$, denoted by $\pi(G)$, is defined to be the least number of pebbles to guarantee that there is a sequence of pebbling movement that places at least one pebble on each vertex $v$, for any configuration of pebbles on $G$. In this paper, we improve the upper bound of $\pi(G\square H)$ from $2\pi(G)\pi(H)$ to $\left(2-\frac{1}{\min\{\pi(G),\pi(H)\}}\right)\pi(G)\pi(H)$ where $\pi(G)$, $\pi(H)$ and $\pi(G\square H)$ are the pebbling number of graphs $G$, $H$ and the Cartesian product graph $G\square H$, respectively. Moreover, we also discuss such bound for strong product graphs, cross product graphs and coronas.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Graph pebbling</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Graham's conjecture</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">product graph</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">corona</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://toc.ui.ac.ir/article_25997_501663d1ee8baceb41a23ea159ff00d0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Transactions on Combinatorics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8657</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Chromatic number and signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>327</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>334</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">26159</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/toc.2021.129720.1876</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Oboudi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 71457-44776, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>For any simple graph $G$, the signless Laplacian matrix of $G$ is defined as $D(G)+A(G)$, where $D(G)$ and $A(G)$ are the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and the adjacency matrix of $G$, respectively. %Let $\chi(G)$ be the chromatic number of $G$ Let $q(G)$ be the signless Laplacian spectral radius of $G$ (the largest eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian matrix of $G$). In this paper we find some relations between the chromatic number and the signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs. In particular, we characterize all graphs $G$ of order $n$ with odd chromatic number $\chi$ such that $q(G)=2n\Big(1-\frac{1}{\chi}\Big)$. Finally we show that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ and with chromatic number $\chi$, then under certain conditions, $q(G)&lt;2n\Big(1-\frac{1}{\chi}\Big)-\frac{2}{n}$. This result improves some previous similar results.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">chromatic number</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Majorization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Signless Laplacian matrix</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Signless Laplacian spectral radius</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://toc.ui.ac.ir/article_26159_fec709a44b419ec4680f4424fb080a49.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Transactions on Combinatorics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8657</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Linear codes resulting from finite group actions</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>335</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>343</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">26249</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/toc.2022.126254.1786</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Driss</FirstName>
					<LastName>Harzalla</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, University of Cadi Ayyad, Box 63 46000 Route Sidi Bouzid, Safi, Morocco</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this article, we use group action theory to define some important ternary linear codes. Some of these codes are self-orthogonal having a minimum distance achieving the lower bound in the previous records. Then, we define two new codes sharing the same automorphism group isomorphic to $C_2 \times M_{11}$ where $M_{11}$ is the Sporadic Mathieu group and $C_{2}$ is a cyclic group of two elements. We also study the natural action of the general linear group $GL (k, 2) $ on the vector space $F_2 ^ k$ to characterize Hamming codes $H_k (2) $ and their automorphism group.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Linear Code automorphism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Group Actions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hamming codes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">simplex codes</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://toc.ui.ac.ir/article_26249_cef63884ba688f96468d5abf3cb393bb.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
